Eli hyödyttääkö tuollaista vaihtaa lähes vakio 5.0l GT:hen?
Vai nouseeko tehojen sijasta ainoastaan kulutus?
Alla oleva mielenkiintoinen stoori kun ei sitä ilmaiseksi paljasta.
"Lainattu fordmuscle.comista":
C&L Performance 76mm Mass Air Meter and Pro-Flow Tube for 5.0L Mustangs. Is a bigger mass air meter a worth upgrade for a bone-stock 5.0L? How about for a mildly modified one? We find out in this article...
Like carburetors were in the 60's and 70's, mass air meters are today one of the "bigger must be better" modifications that performance seekers ponder over.
If you own a mass-air 5.0L vehicle, then you are no doubt aware of all the hype surrounding bigger mass air meters and throttle bodies. The stock mass air meter is restrictive, so they say, and you must upgrade to larger bore to allow the engine to breathe -as the argument goes.
TrueFlow
Typically such arguments rarely apply to stock or relatively stock vehicles. Sure, a 5.0L with better heads and maybe cam will need to reduce the upstream restrictions, but is there really anything to gain by doing this on a stock engine?
We decided to find out. We obtained C&L's new 76mm mass air meter and "Trueflow" tube package and tried it on a pair of vehicles. We installed it first on a bone stock AOD 5.0L Mustang, replacing the stock 55mm unit, and track tested it. Then we installed it on a modified 5.0L engine, along with some matching 24lb injectors, and compared the results to the stock 19lb meter/injector combination.
[You must be a subscriber to continue.]
